Johannesburg – The failed bid for Willie Hofmeyr – former offense ban (AFU) – to block the reintroduction of fraud and corruption charges against former President Jacob Zuma has come back to haunt him.
This came after the Mokgoro survey led by retired Judge Yvonne Mokgoro gave the lawyer to suspended National Director of Public Prosecutions, Adv Nomgcobo Jiba, permission to cross Hofmeyr in his role in the then NPA's decision to block DA & # 39; s eight-year struggle against forcing reinstatement against Zuma.
Earlier in the morning, Hofmeyr filed an application before the Mokgoro investigation and asked the panel did not allow Jiba & # 39; s lawyer Adv Norman Arendse SC to question him about the affidavit he deposited in 2015 to protect Zuma. In his application, Hofmeyr claimed that his lawyer Adv Annade Theart, the Mokgoro investigation area, should focus on Jiba and NPA's Special Commercial Crime Unit (SCCU) director to keep fitness in the NPA. He was determined that if the inquiry made such a request, it would extend the scope of its mandate, which was presented by President Cyril Ramaphosa last October.
However, Arendse disagreed strongly. He said Hofmeyr, before the Mokgoro study, testified that Jiba & # 39; s position as acting director of the prosecution since 2011 attracted negative media advertising. He said Jiba was also accused of just prosecuting Zuma's political opponents – who allegedly included IPID head Robert McBride and former hawker Anwa Dramat and former NPA chief prosecutor Glynnis Breytenbach.
In support of his argument, the Arendse Mokgoro study told that a similar decision was found against Hofmeyr in the Supreme Court judgment (SCA) by Judge Mahomed Navsa in October 2017.
"In its announcement, which was dismissed by SCA, Hofmeyr said the then National Director of Public Prosecutions Bulelani Ngcuka (that is, in fact, Vusi Pikoli) and Leonard McCarthy had collaborated with former President Thabo Mbeki to delay the prosecution of Zuma in 2007, "Arendse said.
He did not give finer details, but in court case law Hofmeyr had argued that the delay in prosecution aimed to frustrate Zuma's chances of taking over ANC's leadership prior to the controversial Polokwane conference in December 2007.
Hofmeyr in his affidavit questioned Pikoli and McCarthy's decision to charge Zuma after the result of the Polokwane conference in his election as president after he overthrew Mbeki.
Arendse argued that his behavior was probably worse or the same in relation to the accusation that Jiba had in the Mokgoro probe.
Judge Mokgoro gave Jiba permission to grab Hofmeyr on his behavior on the SCA judgment.
In that judgment, Judge Navsa found his authority contradictory. The SCA judges also found that the former former national director of public prosecution, Mokotedi Mpshe, in his decision to revoke the fight against fraud and the corruption charge against Zuma, invoked an incorrect law 179 (5) to lose the tax.
Judge Azhar Cachalia also pointed out that Mpshe, in his affirmative order, plagiarized previous judgment that did not support his case.