Monday , November 30 2020

All Android antivirus programs are ineffective?

More than two-thirds of all Android antivirus programs are ineffective, and most of them do nothing at all.

Facepalm: In a survey of 250 antivirus programs on Android, only 80 percent blocked more than 30 percent of malware samples. Some of the applications tested did not even have antivirus functionality.

AV-Comparatives is an industry research group that evaluates the effectiveness of antivirus programs, has recently conducted a study of Android antivirus from the Google Play store, and the results were rather surprising. They tested each app with 2,000 of the most common Android malware threats and recorded them that were taken and lost. The tests were automated but performed on real phones rather than emulators.

The test was designed to be simple and most real antivirus programs have registered 100% of the samples. Overall, 50 applications scored over 90%.

As a control, they also tested their own applications to see if antivirus programs actually scanned the phone. They found that many antivirus programs simply tagged other users' phone apps as suspicious unless they were on a hard-coded list of authorized applications.

Some apps showed a status bar during a "scan", but it was simply based on a predefined delay, no matter how many files were in the phone. Some of the applications have even been considered risky as the developers have forgotten to add their own name to the list of authorized applications of the application.

There was also widespread plagiarism among less legitimate applications. Many have simply used the antivirus engine of another reputable program, even though their own app still pays off. Some of the applications even copied the legitimate application interface as shown below.

It can sometimes be difficult to determine which applications are right, as shady developers can buy comments and reviews.

The refresh rate or number of downloads is also not the best indicator. AV-Comparatives recommends sticking to known brands because the diluted free version of an actual application is better than any fraudulent application.

Avast, AVG, Avira, Bitdefender, BullGuard, Emsisoft, ESET, F-Secure, Kaspersky Lab, McAfee, Sophos, STOPzilla, Symantec, Tencent, Trend Micro, VIPRE, Lookout, Malwarebytes, CheckPoint and so on. Check the full list report.

We are also surprised at the amount of fake "security" software distributed on Google Play without any intervention by the platform. We must also assume that the owners of legitimate audiovisual applications whose work has been abandoned by others have already attempted to rectify this problem, but the application business in general is very difficult to handle. number of poor quality applications. Waiting to be discovered. Google ends up deleting most of them, but not before thousands of users download them.

Source link