Friday , April 23 2021

Will "Fantastic Animals 2" Twist Angry Fans?

A revelation of "Grindelwald's crime" can delight (or anger) long fans of the Harry Potter franchise.

[Denhärberättelseninnehållermindrespoilersför[Thisstorycontainsminorspoilersfor[Denhärberättelseninnehållermindrespoilersför[ThisstorycontainsminorspoilersforAmazing animals: Grindelwald's crime]

This weekend is the release of Amazing animals: Grindelwald's crime, the other in J.K. Rowling and director David Yates fifth Amazing animals series. While the first movie offered a relatively straight plot about Newt Scamander (Eddie Redmayne) and a plethora of new characters to Rowlings Wizarding World, at least until the third law, this second part of Rowling's universe and cranes in Dumbledore's (Jude Law) battle against Grindelwald (Johnny Depp) – a backstory card featured in the Harry Potter series. Grindelwald's crime are sprawling, some may say a mistake, and openly touched surnames, family trees, political connections and birthrights. This is nothing new to those who have been invested in Rowlings Harry Potter books for the past 21 years, but for those who are drawn to the franchise because of pure plot lines and structure of Harry Potter movies where non-readers were welcome, Grindelwald's crime request to see your reference documents at the door.

The Harry Potter filming, written mainly by Steve Kloves, played or omitted significant pieces of Rowling's works, truncating flashbacks, exclusively prophecies, and remained generally concerned with who was related to who, unless it affected the main story. It was partly necessary to create a feasible driving time and to start the viewers who had not spent their time and immerse themselves in Rowling's novels. If it is done today, there is no doubt that each film deduction follows The Captor of Azkaban (2004) would be divided into two to make room for each plot line. Whether this would create stronger movies is debatable. The Amazing animals Movies, which see Rowling in the role of scriptwriter for the first time, are invested in connective tissue and different threads that another scriptwriter can omit on the basis of adaptation. And as originally set as a trilogy, it has evolved into a total of five planned films.

Rowling's romanist and mythos-heavy attitude to screenwriting is not entirely new user-friendly, but rewarding those who invested their time reading the series and pouring through posts on Potter, but it feels true for Rowling's style and voice. A lot of Grindelwald's crime based on name recognition, not so much in a flashing way, but in an attempt to show that every introduction and reference questions, if not later then. Rowling emphasizes the power of the name in her expansion of Wizarding World through prequels is an alternative course from what Lucasfilm creates in their Star Wars follow-up trilogy.

Entering J.J. Abrams' The power wakes up In 2015, one of the biggest questions was how these new characters, Rey, Finn, Poe and Kylo Ren were related to the ancient character of characters introduced in the Original Mylogy and Prequels. From that apparently logical: Rey is the daughter of Luke Skywalker, to the everyday: Find as son of Lando or Mace Windu were fans with theories of how it all was. Although talk about The last Jedi can be considered to be exhausted, there is something that prevents the fact that Rey was revealed to be "no" or perhaps more precise, her own person obsessed with the destiny of others. The only person from this new generation Star Wars Signs of direct relatives from the past are Kylo Ren, and this factor has left him fragmented and an emotional wreck. While Kylo fights for identifying the concepts and names of the past, characters like Rey, Finn, Poe and Rose, who can not offer a relationship, can not cut their own legacy and be important simply because they exist and not because they are bits in a name game. Despite The last Jedi make it clear that Rey's past and parenthood are not important, there are still those who hope that a more friendly friendly response will come to life in Abrams' Episode IX or one off Star Wars stories. Just this summer, fancy lines and timelines appeared in an attempt to suggest that Rey really is the offspring of SoloS Qi & rd and Darth Maul. Genetic problems aside (she would have at least one pair of horns, people) this is probably not the way any revelation about Rey is coming. But the efforts to make it work, emphasize names and family trees are not far from what Rowling does and she relies on these factors far more than any of them Star Wars prequels have done.

In the middle of Grindelwald's crime Credence Barebones' (Ezra Miller) Efforts to Find Their True Parenting. As an obscurus, one of the most powerful magical creatures, Grindelwald tries to claim him in his efforts to wage war against the non-wizard world, while a global coalition of Aurors tries to eliminate him before Grindelwald can seize him. Credibility, interestingly, is a dark reflection of Harry Potter himself. He is another battered boy who has huge power for a wild dictator. Nevertheless, Harry is defined by his last name. Despite his desire to be normal, to be anonymous, his name wins him allied, prestige and academic benefits. The name Potter may have associations with a curse, but Harry is often blessed by it and it is his family, his bloodline and the love that comes from what saves him time after time. Harry Potter and his moniker like "The Boy Who Lived" complete his self-esteem and his moral code. But Credence, when he follows false lead after lead, manipulated by Grindelwald and his followers, is undefined and morally gray. He starve to be someone, to stand out, to weigh up in the big plane of things. While Rowling toys with the idea that he is not someone, and like Rey, a unique device, third revelation revelations give concrete answers and sent more than a few guesswork through a shocked audience. When Credence's crosses with Leta Lestrange (Zoe Kravitz) and the secrets of the Lestrange family, he becomes fitting "The Boy Who Died" when he appeared to be someone who, if not for a twist of fate, should not have been at all.

Credence's identity changes the course of Wizarding World mythos as we thought we knew, and if the enthusiastic reactions of a fan screening populated by a handful of people wearing wizards robes is a small indication, it rewards those who have invested their time in the series across their different media. Of course, not everyone will be happy with the revelation, and Rowling's recent work has already been characterized as fanfiction. It's an interesting criticism, given that this is Rowling's world to play with as she chooses, yet, Grindelwald's crime based on the importance of names and bloodlines, and those who play it do so because of it. It's interesting to see some of the backlashes Grindelwald's crime and Rowling's efforts to tie Amazing animals to Harry Potter compared with the contradiction received byThe last Jedi In order to deviate from previous posts and immediately killing of characters, they are regarded as booklets in the franchise. It speaks to the holiness we add on iconic stories and raises the question of whether these characteristics remain and will continue to be iconic due to name recognition or because of their ability to expand by breaking bands that bind them.


Amazing animals: Grindelwald's crime

Source link